<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>FitMarker</title>
<atom:link href="http://fitmarker.com/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<link>http://fitmarker.com/</link>
<description>Stories posted in Weight Training</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:18:42 -0500</pubDate>
<item>
<title>Differential effects of strength training leading to failure versus not to failure on hormonal responses, strength, and muscle         power gains</title>
<link>http://fitmarker.com/weight-training/differential-effects-of-strength-training-leading-to-failure-versus-not-to-failure-on-hormonal-responses-strength-and-muscle-power-gains/</link>
<description><![CDATA[ The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of 11 wk of resistance training to failure vs. nonfailure, followed by an identical 5-wk peaking period of maximal strength and power training for both groups as well as to examine the underlying physiological changes in basal circulating anabolic and catabolic hormones. Forty-two physically active men were matched and then randomly assigned to either a training to failure (RF; n = 14), nonfailure (NRF; n = 15), or control groups (C; n = 13). Muscular and power testing and blood draws to determine basal hormonal concentrations were conducted before the initiation of training (T0), after 6 wk of training (T1), after 11 wk of training (T2), and after 16 wk of training (T3). Both RF and NRF resulted in similar gains in 1-repetition maximum bench press (23 and 23%) and parallel squat (22 and 23%), muscle power output of the arm (27 and 28%) and leg extensor muscles (26 and 29%), and maximal number of repetitions performed during parallel squat (66 and 69%). RF group experienced larger gains in the maximal number of repetitions performed during the bench press. The peaking phase (T2 to T3) after NRF resulted in larger gains in muscle power output of the lower extremities, whereas after RF it resulted in larger gains in the maximal number of repetitions performed during the bench press. Strength training leading to RF resulted in reductions in resting concentrations of IGF-1 and elevations in IGFBP-3, whereas NRF resulted in reduced resting cortisol concentrations and an elevation in resting serum total testosterone concentration. This investigation demonstrated a potential beneficial stimulus of NRF for improving strength and power, especially during the subsequent peaking training period, whereas performing sets to failure resulted in greater gains in local muscular endurance. Elevation in IGFBP-3 after resistance training may have been compensatory to accommodate the reduction in IGF-1 to preserve IGF availability. ]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 01:53:53 -0500</pubDate>
<guid>http://fitmarker.com/weight-training/differential-effects-of-strength-training-leading-to-failure-versus-not-to-failure-on-hormonal-responses-strength-and-muscle-power-gains/</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Functional Performance and Inflammatory Cytokines after Squat Exercises and Whole-Body Vibration in Elderly Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis.</title>
<link>http://fitmarker.com/weight-training/functional-performance-and-inflammatory-cytokines-after-squat-exercises-and-whole-body-vibration-in-elderly-individuals-with-knee-osteoarthritis/</link>
<description><![CDATA[ OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the effects of squat exercises combined with whole-body vibration on the plasma concentration of inflammatory markers and the functional performance of elderly individuals with knee osteoarthritis.
DESIGN:
Clinical, prospective, randomized, single-blinded study.
SETTING:
Exercise Physiology Laboratory.
PARTICIPANTS:
Thirty-two elderly subjects with knee osteoarthritis were divided into three groups [i.e., squat exercises on a vibratory platform (platform group N= 11), squat exercises without vibration (squat group N= 10) and the control group (N=11)].
INTERVENTIONS:
The structured program of squat exercises in the platform and squat groups was conducted three times per week, on alternate days, for 12 weeks.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
Plasma sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 were measured using immunoassays (the ELISA method). The Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire was used to evaluate self-reported physical function, pain and stiffness. The 6-minute walk test, the Berg balance scale, and gait speed were used to evaluate physical function.
RESULTS:
In the group that performed squat exercises on a vibratory platform, there were significant reductions in the plasma concentrations of the inflammatory markers sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 (p&amp;lt;0.001 and p&amp;lt;0.05, respectively) and self-reported pain (p&amp;lt;0.05) compared with the control group; however, there was an increase in balance (p&amp;lt;0.05) and speed and distance walked (p&amp;lt;0.05 and p&amp;lt;0.001, respectively). In addition, the group that performed squat exercises on a vibratory platform walked faster than the group that only performed squat exercises (p&amp;lt;0.01).
CONCLUSION:
The results suggest that whole-body vibration training improves self-perception of pain, balance, gait quality and inflammatory markers in elderly subjects with knee osteoarthritis.
Copyright © 2012 the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. ]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 14:35:11 -0500</pubDate>
<guid>http://fitmarker.com/weight-training/functional-performance-and-inflammatory-cytokines-after-squat-exercises-and-whole-body-vibration-in-elderly-individuals-with-knee-osteoarthritis/</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Associations of Maximal Strength and Muscular Endurance Test Scores with Cardiorespiratiory Fitness and Body Composition</title>
<link>http://fitmarker.com/weight-training/associations-of-maximal-strength-and-muscular-endurance-test-scores-with-cardiorespiratiory-fitness-and-body-composition/</link>
<description><![CDATA[ Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to assess the relationships between maximal strength and muscular endurance test scores additionally to previously widely studied measures of body composition and maximal aerobic capacity. 846 young men (25.5±5.0 yrs) participated in the study. Maximal strength was measured using isometric bench press, leg extension and grip strength. Muscular endurance tests consisted of push-ups, sit-ups and repeated squats. An indirect graded cycle ergometer test was used to estimate maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max). Body composition was determined with bioelectrical impedance. Moreover, waist circumference (WC) and height were measured and body mass index (BMI) calculated. Maximal bench press was positively correlated with push-ups (R=0.37, p&amp;lt;0.001), grip strength (R=0.12, p&amp;lt;0.001) and sit-ups (R=0.12, p&amp;lt;0.001) while maximal leg extension force revealed only a weak positive correlation with repeated squats (R=0.05, p&amp;lt;0.001,). However, moderate correlation between repeated squats and VO2max was found (R=0.30, p&amp;lt;0.001) In addition, BM and body fat correlated negatively with muscular endurance (R=0.10-0.22, p&amp;lt;0.001), while FFM and maximal isometric strength correlated positively (R=0.13-0.20, p&amp;lt;0.001). In conclusion, muscular endurance test scores were related to maximal aerobic capacity and body fat content, while fat free mass was associated with maximal strength test scores and thus is a major determinant for maximal strength. A contributive role of maximal strength to muscular endurance tests could be indentified for the upper, but not the lower extremities. These findings suggest that push-up test is not only indicative of body fat content and maximal aerobic capacity but also maximal strength of upper body, whereas repeated squat test is mainly indicative of body fat content and maximal aerobic capacity, but not maximal strength of lower extremities. ]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 13:56:55 -0500</pubDate>
<guid>http://fitmarker.com/weight-training/associations-of-maximal-strength-and-muscular-endurance-test-scores-with-cardiorespiratiory-fitness-and-body-composition/</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Low-load high volume resistance exercise stimulates muscle protein synthesis more than high-load low volume resistance exercise in young men.</title>
<link>http://fitmarker.com/weight-training/low-load-high-volume-resistance-exercise-stimulates-muscle-protein-synthesis-more-than-high-load-low-volume-resistance-exercise-in-young-men/</link>
<description><![CDATA[ Abstract
BACKGROUND:
We aimed to determine the effect of resistance exercise intensity (%1 repetition maximum-1RM) and volume on muscle protein synthesis, anabolic signaling, and myogenic gene expression.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:
Fifteen men (21+/-1 years; BMI=24.1+/-0.8 kg/m2) performed 4 sets of unilateral leg extension exercise at different exercise loads and/or volumes: 90% of repetition maximum (1RM) until volitional failure (90FAIL), 30% 1RM work-matched to 90%FAIL (30WM), or 30% 1RM performed until volitional failure (30FAIL). Infusion of [ring-13C6] phenylalanine with biopsies was used to measure rates of mixed (MIX), myofibrillar (MYO), and sarcoplasmic (SARC) protein synthesis at rest, and 4 h and 24 h after exercise. Exercise at 30WM induced a significant increase above rest in MIX (121%) and MYO (87%) protein synthesis at 4 h post-exercise and but at 24 h in the MIX only. The increase in the rate of protein synthesis in MIX and MYO at 4 h post-exercise with 90FAIL and 30FAIL was greater than 30WM, with no difference between these conditions; however, MYO remained elevated (199%) above rest at 24 h only in 30FAIL. There was a significant increase in AktSer473 at 24h in all conditions (P=0.023) and mTORSer2448 phosphorylation at 4 h post-exercise (P=0.025). Phosporylation of Erk1/2Tyr202/204, p70S6KThr389, and 4E-BP1Thr37/46 increased significantly (P&amp;lt;0.05) only in the 30FAIL condition at 4 h post-exercise, whereas, 4E-BP1Thr37/46 phosphorylation was greater 24 h after exercise than at rest in both 90FAIL (237%) and 30FAIL (312%) conditions. Pax7 mRNA expression increased at 24 h post-exercise (P=0.02) regardless of condition. The mRNA expression of MyoD and myogenin were consistently elevated in the 30FAIL condition.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE:
These results suggest that low-load high volume resistance exercise is more effective in inducing acute muscle anabolism than high-load low volume or work matched resistance exercise modes. ]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 02:07:32 -0500</pubDate>
<guid>http://fitmarker.com/weight-training/low-load-high-volume-resistance-exercise-stimulates-muscle-protein-synthesis-more-than-high-load-low-volume-resistance-exercise-in-young-men/</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Effects of combined endurance and strength training on muscle strength, power and hypertrophy in 40-67-year-old men</title>
<link>http://fitmarker.com/weight-training/effects-of-combined-endurance-and-strength-training-on-muscle-strength-power-and-hypertrophy-in-40-67-year-old-men/</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <b>Abstract:</b> Both strength and endurance training have several positive effects on aging muscle and physical performance of middle-aged and older adults, but their combination may compromise optimal adaptation. This study examined the possible interference of combined strength and endurance training on neuromuscular performance and skeletal muscle hypertrophy in previously untrained 40-67-year-old men. Maximal strength and muscle activation in the upper and lower extremities, maximal concentric power, aerobic capacity and muscle fiber size and distribution in the vastus lateralis muscle were measured before and after a 21-week training period. Ninety-six men [mean age 56 (SD 7) years] completed high-intensity strength training (S) twice a week, endurance training (E) twice a week, combined training (SE) four times per week or served as controls (C). SE and S led to similar gains in one repetition maximum strength of the lower extremities [22 (9)% and 21 (8)%, P&amp;lt;0.001], whereas E and C showed minor changes. Cross-sectional area of type II muscle fibers only increased in S [26 (22)%, P=0.002], while SE showed an inconsistent, non-significant change [8 (35)%, P=0.73]. Combined training may interfere with muscle hypertrophy in aging men, despite similar gains in maximal strength between the strength and the combined training groups. ]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 03:02:52 -0500</pubDate>
<guid>http://fitmarker.com/weight-training/effects-of-combined-endurance-and-strength-training-on-muscle-strength-power-and-hypertrophy-in-40-67-year-old-men/</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men</title>
<link>http://fitmarker.com/weight-training/resistance-exercise-load-does-not-determine-training-mediated-hypertrophic-gains-in-young-men/</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <b>Abstract:</b>We have reported that the acute post-exercise increases in muscle protein synthesis rates, with differing nutritional support, are predictive of longer-term training-induced muscle hypertrophy...

...There was no correlation between phosphorylation of any signalling protein and hypertrophy. In accordance with our previous acute measurements of muscle protein synthetic rates a lower load lifted to failure resulted in similar hypertrophy as a heavy load lifted to failure.

<b>Summary:</b> So basically, training to failure with decent volume is a better indicator of growth than the weight on the bar itself. This makes sense, as light powerlifters lift immense loads and still manage to stay in their respective weight class. ]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 01:21:07 -0500</pubDate>
<guid>http://fitmarker.com/weight-training/resistance-exercise-load-does-not-determine-training-mediated-hypertrophic-gains-in-young-men/</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Associations of maximal strength and muscular endurance test scores with cardiorespiratory fitness and body composition.</title>
<link>http://fitmarker.com/weight-training/associations-of-maximal-strength-and-muscular-endurance-test-scores-with-cardiorespiratory-fitness-and-body-composition/</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <b>Abstract:</b>
The purpose of the present study was to assess the relationships between maximal strength and muscular endurance test scores additionally to previously widely studied measures of body composition and maximal aerobic capacity. 846 young men (25.5±5.0 yrs) participated in the study. Maximal strength was measured using isometric bench press, leg extension and grip strength. 

Muscular endurance tests consisted of push-ups, sit-ups and repeated squats. An indirect graded cycle ergometer test was used to estimate maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max). Body composition was determined with bioelectrical impedance. Moreover, waist circumference (WC) and height were measured and body mass index (BMI) calculated. Maximal bench press was positively correlated with push-ups (R=0.37, p&amp;lt;0.001), grip strength (R=0.12, p&amp;lt;0.001) and sit-ups (R=0.12, p&amp;lt;0.001) while maximal leg extension force revealed only a weak positive correlation with repeated squats (R=0.05, p&amp;lt;0.001,). However, moderate correlation between repeated squats and VO2max was found (R=0.30, p&amp;lt;0.001) In addition, BM and body fat correlated negatively with muscular endurance (R=0.10-0.22, p&amp;lt;0.001), while FFM and maximal isometric strength correlated positively (R=0.13-0.20, p&amp;lt;0.001). 

In conclusion, muscular endurance test scores were related to maximal aerobic capacity and body fat content, while fat free mass was associated with maximal strength test scores and thus is a major determinant for maximal strength. A contributive role of maximal strength to muscular endurance tests could be indentified for the upper, but not the lower extremities. These findings suggest that push-up test is not only indicative of body fat content and maximal aerobic capacity but also maximal strength of upper body, whereas repeated squat test is mainly indicative of body fat content and maximal aerobic capacity, but not maximal strength of lower extremities. ]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:44:28 -0500</pubDate>
<guid>http://fitmarker.com/weight-training/associations-of-maximal-strength-and-muscular-endurance-test-scores-with-cardiorespiratory-fitness-and-body-composition/</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Muscles, exercise and obesity: skeletal muscle as a secretory organ</title>
<link>http://fitmarker.com/weight-training/muscles-exercise-and-obesity-skeletal-muscle-as-a-secretory-organ/</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <b>Abstract:</b> During the past decade, skeletal muscle has been identified as a secretory organ. Accordingly, we have suggested that cytokines and other peptides that are produced, expressed and released by muscle fibres and exert either autocrine, paracrine or endocrine effects should be classified as myokines. The finding that the muscle secretome consists of several hundred secreted peptides provides a conceptual basis and a whole new paradigm for understanding how muscles communicate with other organs, such as adipose tissue, liver, pancreas, bones and brain. However, some myokines exert their effects within the muscle itself. 

Thus, myostatin, LIF, IL-6 and IL-7 are involved in muscle hypertrophy and myogenesis, whereas BDNF and IL-6 are involved in AMPK-mediated fat oxidation. IL-6 also appears to have systemic effects on the liver, adipose tissue and the immune system, and mediates crosstalk between intestinal L cells and pancreatic islets. Other myokines include the osteogenic factors IGF-1 and FGF-2; FSTL-1, which improves the endothelial function of the vascular system; and the PGC-1α-dependent myokine irisin, which drives brown-fat-like development. 

Studies in the past few years suggest the existence of yet unidentified factors, secreted from muscle cells, which may influence cancer cell growth and pancreas function.<b> Many proteins produced by skeletal muscle are dependent upon contraction; therefore, physical inactivity probably leads to an altered myokine response, which could provide a potential mechanism for the association between sedentary behaviour and many chronic diseases.</b> ]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 01:41:55 -0500</pubDate>
<guid>http://fitmarker.com/weight-training/muscles-exercise-and-obesity-skeletal-muscle-as-a-secretory-organ/</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Effects of Weightlifting vs. Kettlebell</title>
<link>http://fitmarker.com/weight-training/effects-of-weightlifting-vs-kettlebell/</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <b>The Abstract</b>
"The present study compared the effects of six weeks of weightlifting plus traditional heavy resistance training exercises vs. kettlebell training on strength, power, and anthropometric measures. 

Thirty males were randomly assigned to one of two groups: 1) weightlifting (n = 13; mean ± SD, age: 22.92 ± 1.98 y; body mass: 80.57 ± 12.99 kg; height: 174.56 ± 5.80 cm); or 2) or kettlebell (n = 17; mean ± SD, age: 22.76 ± 1.86 y; body mass: 78.99 ± 10.68 kg; height: 176.79 ± 5.08 cm) and trained two times a week for six weeks. A linear periodization model was used for training; weeks 1-3 volume was 3×6 (kettlebell swings or high pull), 4×4 (accelerated swings or power clean), and 4×6 (goblet squats or back squats) and volume increased during weeks 4-6 to 4×6, 6×4, and 4×6, respectively. 

Participants were assessed for height (cm), body mass (kg), and body composition (skinfolds). Strength was assessed by the back squat 1RM while power was assessed by the vertical jump and power clean 1RM. The results of this study indicated that short-term weightlifting and kettlebell training were effective at increasing strength and power. However, the gain in strength using weightlifting movements was greater than that for kettlebell training.

Neither method of training led to significant changes in any of the anthropometric measures. <b>In conclusion, 6 weeks of weightlifting induced significantly greater improvements in strength compared to kettlebell training.</b> No between-group differences existed for the vertical jump or body composition." ]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:49:15 -0500</pubDate>
<guid>http://fitmarker.com/weight-training/effects-of-weightlifting-vs-kettlebell/</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>T NATION | The Contreras Files: Volume I</title>
<link>http://fitmarker.com/weight-training/t-nation-the-contreras-files-volume-i/</link>
<description><![CDATA[ To say I'm a workaholic is like saying Tiger Woods has commitment issues. Through all the lifting, training, reading, and researching that I do, I'm constantly being exposed to and coming up with new ideas.

This column will introduce T Nation readers to just some of what I happen to stumble upon every day, in no particular order of importance. The typical lifter, athlete, personal trainer, strength coach, or physical therapist is bound to find something useful in this article. ]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 07:44:44 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://fitmarker.com/weight-training/t-nation-the-contreras-files-volume-i/</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
