<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>FitMarker</title>
<atom:link href="http://fitmarker.com/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<link>http://fitmarker.com/</link>
<description>Stories tagged weight lifting</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:28:30 -0500</pubDate>
<item>
<title>Differential effects of strength training leading to failure versus not to failure on hormonal responses, strength, and muscle         power gains</title>
<link>http://fitmarker.com/weight-training/differential-effects-of-strength-training-leading-to-failure-versus-not-to-failure-on-hormonal-responses-strength-and-muscle-power-gains/</link>
<description><![CDATA[ The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of 11 wk of resistance training to failure vs. nonfailure, followed by an identical 5-wk peaking period of maximal strength and power training for both groups as well as to examine the underlying physiological changes in basal circulating anabolic and catabolic hormones. Forty-two physically active men were matched and then randomly assigned to either a training to failure (RF; n = 14), nonfailure (NRF; n = 15), or control groups (C; n = 13). Muscular and power testing and blood draws to determine basal hormonal concentrations were conducted before the initiation of training (T0), after 6 wk of training (T1), after 11 wk of training (T2), and after 16 wk of training (T3). Both RF and NRF resulted in similar gains in 1-repetition maximum bench press (23 and 23%) and parallel squat (22 and 23%), muscle power output of the arm (27 and 28%) and leg extensor muscles (26 and 29%), and maximal number of repetitions performed during parallel squat (66 and 69%). RF group experienced larger gains in the maximal number of repetitions performed during the bench press. The peaking phase (T2 to T3) after NRF resulted in larger gains in muscle power output of the lower extremities, whereas after RF it resulted in larger gains in the maximal number of repetitions performed during the bench press. Strength training leading to RF resulted in reductions in resting concentrations of IGF-1 and elevations in IGFBP-3, whereas NRF resulted in reduced resting cortisol concentrations and an elevation in resting serum total testosterone concentration. This investigation demonstrated a potential beneficial stimulus of NRF for improving strength and power, especially during the subsequent peaking training period, whereas performing sets to failure resulted in greater gains in local muscular endurance. Elevation in IGFBP-3 after resistance training may have been compensatory to accommodate the reduction in IGF-1 to preserve IGF availability. ]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 01:53:53 -0500</pubDate>
<guid>http://fitmarker.com/weight-training/differential-effects-of-strength-training-leading-to-failure-versus-not-to-failure-on-hormonal-responses-strength-and-muscle-power-gains/</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Effects of Weightlifting vs. Kettlebell</title>
<link>http://fitmarker.com/weight-training/effects-of-weightlifting-vs-kettlebell/</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <b>The Abstract</b>
"The present study compared the effects of six weeks of weightlifting plus traditional heavy resistance training exercises vs. kettlebell training on strength, power, and anthropometric measures. 

Thirty males were randomly assigned to one of two groups: 1) weightlifting (n = 13; mean ± SD, age: 22.92 ± 1.98 y; body mass: 80.57 ± 12.99 kg; height: 174.56 ± 5.80 cm); or 2) or kettlebell (n = 17; mean ± SD, age: 22.76 ± 1.86 y; body mass: 78.99 ± 10.68 kg; height: 176.79 ± 5.08 cm) and trained two times a week for six weeks. A linear periodization model was used for training; weeks 1-3 volume was 3×6 (kettlebell swings or high pull), 4×4 (accelerated swings or power clean), and 4×6 (goblet squats or back squats) and volume increased during weeks 4-6 to 4×6, 6×4, and 4×6, respectively. 

Participants were assessed for height (cm), body mass (kg), and body composition (skinfolds). Strength was assessed by the back squat 1RM while power was assessed by the vertical jump and power clean 1RM. The results of this study indicated that short-term weightlifting and kettlebell training were effective at increasing strength and power. However, the gain in strength using weightlifting movements was greater than that for kettlebell training.

Neither method of training led to significant changes in any of the anthropometric measures. <b>In conclusion, 6 weeks of weightlifting induced significantly greater improvements in strength compared to kettlebell training.</b> No between-group differences existed for the vertical jump or body composition." ]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:49:15 -0500</pubDate>
<guid>http://fitmarker.com/weight-training/effects-of-weightlifting-vs-kettlebell/</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Weight Training Routines and Individual Temperament</title>
<link>http://fitmarker.com/motivation/weight-training-routines-and-individual-temperament/</link>
<description><![CDATA[ In our never-ending quest for the perfect weight training routines, ultimate post-workout meal, and optimal rep range with regards to hypertrophy, one aspect of this weight training game we should always consider is individuality.  While I don’t believe many of us to be unique, little snowflakes, I am certain that we all bear different personalities and temperaments.

While we may not differ too drastically from one another on a biological front, the way we process ideas, and associate meaning to various situations can be dramatically different from one person to the next. ]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 08:23:37 -0600</pubDate>
<guid>http://fitmarker.com/motivation/weight-training-routines-and-individual-temperament/</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Five Ways to Get Faster Results with Dumbbells</title>
<link>http://fitmarker.com/strength/five-ways-to-get-faster-results-with-dumbbells/</link>
<description><![CDATA[ Outline of five ways get better utilize dumbbell training. ]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:53:47 -0500</pubDate>
<guid>http://fitmarker.com/strength/five-ways-to-get-faster-results-with-dumbbells/</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Weight Lifting Program Guide | Train to Gain Muscle Mass and Strength</title>
<link>http://fitmarker.com/bodybuilding/weight-lifting-program-guide-train-to-gain-muscle-mass-and-strength/</link>
<description><![CDATA[ The essentials of a weight lifting program. A straight-forward guide on how to gain muscle mass and strength. Master your program by learning the most effective exercises and workout concepts. ]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:39:19 -0500</pubDate>
<guid>http://fitmarker.com/bodybuilding/weight-lifting-program-guide-train-to-gain-muscle-mass-and-strength/</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
